Oprah has been floated around as a democratic challenger to Trump. Seal called her out on some issues. Only NOW, less than a week after tarnishing her, Seal is being accused of sexual misconduct… fishy
Here is the article where Seal is accused. I’m not saying the democrats like Oprah enough to make her a candidate but celebrity support, especially a respected black female, is important to any candidate. Is this a real allegation or a paid attack against Seal. To me, it seems too convenient for everyone except Seal.
Seal? Oprah?
Pop star Seal is being investigated over sex assault claims mere days after highlighting Oprah Winfrey’s connections to Hollywood mega-pervert Harvey Weinstein.
American actress Tracey Birdsall reported the “Kiss from a Rose” singer to the LA County Sheriff’s Dept. Saturday, alleging the former neighbor forced himself on her during a visit to his home to retreive a borrowed salad spinner.
Birdsall says she asked Seal, “What are you doing?!” and that he responded, “I’m kissing you!” before proceeding to grope her breasts.
_________________
Sing_about_me: Seal is being accused of groping a woman without her consent, which is full blown sexual assault. Sexual misconduct is anything you want it to be, could just be asking a girl out on a date or watching porn. It’s a purposely nebulous term so that anyone can accuse anyone of it if they wish to smear them or get attention. It’s much easier to do this if you want to smear people, which makes me think, given that he is being accused of actual sexual assault, it probably isn’t a smear campaign.
Straightfromthe: Let them all eat each other. Seal was Heidi Klum’s handler for years (an MK Ultra sex slave). Don’t trust any of these people.
GatorNelson: The rumor that Seal is a wife beater has been going around for awhile… definitely before the Oprah thing. I doubt this latest accusation is true though… it screams retaliation for speaking out against Oprah.
[check out DM article](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5274885/Seal-investigated-sexual-battery-accusations.html)
‘I felt completely played’: Harvey Weinstein accuser says he lured her in by introducing her to Oprah months before forcing her to perform sex act
Pop singer Seal called out Oprah Winfrey on social media Wednesday, claiming the daytime talk show host is part of the sex abuse problem in Hollywood.
The artist posted a meme to Instagram showing Oprah sucking on Hollywood mega-producer Harvey Weinstein’s ear, with another photo showing Oprah introducing an actress to Weinstein.
Oh I forgot, that's right…..you'd heard the rumours but you had no idea he was actually serially assaulting young stary-eyed actresses who in turn had no idea what they were getting into. My bad. #SanctimoniousHollywood
ScriptRaider: Harvey Weinstein is an old creep but most of these no-talent Hollywood whores knew what they were getting themselves into. They thought if they fucked the big head honcho, he’d make them a star. It’s a risk and a gamble that didn’t pay off for them. But who cares, it’s just sex. Not like they were raped, impregnated or given std’s.
ShiningShrine: ‘I felt completely played’: Harvey Weinstein accuser says he lured her in by introducing her to Oprah months before forcing her to perform sex act and reveals she is seeking MILLIONS in lawsuit
*Kadian Noble, 30, spoke about her alleged assault at the hands of Harvey Weinstein in an interview with CBS This Morning on Tuesday
*On Monday, she sued Weinstein, his brother Bob and The Weinstein Company in a complaint accusing them of violating a federal sex trafficking statute
*’I still can hear the rattle from his belt, like him undoing his belt while he had grip of me,’ said Noble, adding that the assault lasted ‘forever’
*Noble claims Weinstein trapped her in his hotel room and groped her before forcing her to pleasure him to completion in her complaint
Hollywood is trying to make Oprah president. Steven Spielberg: “Oprah would make a brilliant president and I will back her” This is too crazy for words
whyisthismythrowaway: 1. She won’t run.
2. A significant number of people had the same reservations and disbelief about Trump.
Cnt: This is a coordinated effort by the media. I’ve seen several similar articles today reporting that * insert celebs name * thinks Oprah is a ‘ leader ‘ and would be an amazing president. I’m sorry but when did Meryl Streep’s opinion on a speech, at an award ceremony on the other side of the Atlantic become newsworthy for the BBC? It’s so obvious it’s unreal. Saying that, she won’t run. She won’t give up her cushy life.
6GorillionLies: This is a woman that claimed having her baby die was like having a second chance at life in a country that values kissing babies as presidential mandates during elections. She was raped multiple times in her teens by family members. She was whipped and beaten by family members. She has a private school she funds in South Africa where she hand selected the staff and children, yet it has had 2 separate mass sexual assault/grooming/rape scandals and a student with a dead baby in her backpack over a 3 year period. Oh, and she paid off the headmistress in an out of court settlement for defamation lawsuits. She failed to mention these things in her #MeToo speech when she shouldered the duty to stop rape and sexual assault onto the American public at the Golden Globe virtue signalling award show speech. Nor did she mention or call out her very personal friendship with Harvey Weinstein, who is at the heart of many of these Hollywood rape allegations.
There is also the fact she is not Oprah the TV star in real life. Her personal life is very private, from her long rumoured lesbian relationship with Gayle, to the rape and dead child, her admitted time as a cokehead throughout the 80s and abuse inflicted on her by her family to her interactions with fans outside the show that get hushed up in media and swept under the rug. Any deep, political based look into her life would not go well for her or the Oprah brand name. And that Oprah TV star has also given platforms on televsion for anti-vaccinations, fake Holocaust survivors, fake books (million little pieces), pseudo science nutjobs about positive energy and countless other hacks, like Dr Phil. She has stated she will not go into politics exactly because of these numerous political pitfalls.
All of this plus being a member of the Bilderberg Group, who will not suffer such public scrutiny of their members or finances, means she will never run for office. Trump is Trump in person, on TV and in private. Oprah on TV is a character. A fictional, made up persona for public consumption. Not someone with a political viewpoint or agenda. Trump spend the better part of a decade seeding his eventual campaign and running. Oprah wants to be left alone for most part in her private life.
m4rk89: Not only would she be the first female president of the USA, but she would also be the first African-American woman to become president of the country. She’s a liberal celebrity, too (that sounds strangely redundant, though). I’m not saying these are good or bad qualities, I’m just making the observation that in the dystopian world we seem to be getting increasingly immersed in, those elements in her curriculum would suffice to outrun most other candidates. I mean, Clinton had so much of the public on her side just because she is a woman. Everything else would not matter much for so many blind sheep, just the “you-go-girl” attitude that has zombified a ridiculously stupefying portion of the western population.
But then again, Trump became president allegedly against all odds and Mr. Zuckerberg 2020 is also a thing and they’ll-trust-him-dumb-fucks, so fuck me if anything can be predicted in this fucking Orwellian nightmare anymore.
Damn.
Spez: Hey, look what I found! http://www.bbc.com/news/av/entertainment-arts-42655805/tom-hanks-oprah-is-one-of-a-kind
jamasha: Obama (black) + Hillary (female) = Oprah (black female) is the only real reason they want her so badly. To try and prove once more their superiority by electing a minority. That and also because it’s again “their” candidate from their inner circle they can count on to do their bidding. Otherwise it’s the same old – a weak corrupt candidate artificially supported by the masters he serves. Maybe this time prettier to look at, gotta give credit where it’s due, but at the end of the day still the same old. Style over substance. I bet if Oprah fails they’ll try to elevate Streep next. But hey, let them have their hopeful moment that’ll keep them stable.
Three women with college degrees were just telling me that Oprah needs to run for president.
When I asked why, I swear their response was three different variations of “uh duh, cuz it’s Oprah?!”
This is the f–king world we live in now.
This satanic cow who wants to depopulate 90% of the population will be our next POTUS because we live in a celebrity obsessed ClownWorld HONK HONK???.
President Kim Kardashian when?
We’re only going to have celebrity presidents from now on. The retards on the right got their celeb, and next the retards on the left will get theirs.
This is all by design. The powers that be have successfully turned us all into bumbling retards.
_______________
Loiyt: Legitimate question: What makes Oprah running as a celebrity any different than Trump, policy aside?
Afrobean: See: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_clich%C3%A9
Oprah has never stated her policy positions on many important issues. If someone says that she should be president in spite of this, it’s because they want her to be president for another reason, like her race or gender or wealth or celebrity status. Or just because their corporate propaganda told them to think that.
NapalmForNarratives: Chelsea Manning is running for Senate in Maryland. Rephrased, WikiLeaks’ most prolific source/LGBT community activist/international hard news celebrity is going to try to persuade the federal bureaucracy to elect her.
Before you dismiss it, consider this additional fact. I found out about it from Cassandra Fairbanks, the reporter who broke the story about the Sy Hersh regarding Seth Rich–the one that WikiLeaks retweeted. It was her second post as a moderator to r/WikiLeaks. Meanwhile, the Black Hole of Fuckery that was the 2016 election continues to suck in more and more of DC. Whatever the DNC has planned … it ain’t gonna happen.
accountingisboring: I think that’s why the thought of her running scares me the most. People will blindly follow her, like she is some messiah! Just like with Obama, but worse, way worse. Look at the damage he was able to do with such a loyal following, now multiple that by 100.
Drooperdoo: To be fair, a more accurate comparison to Oprah would not be Trump; it would be Reagan. Both Reagan and Oprah were principally in entertainment.
Trump, while a self-promoter, used media to advance his brand, but he was primarily a real estate mogul. A businessman.
Trump is vastly closer to FDR than to either Oprah or Reagan. Both Trump and FDR were New Yorkers who were born rich (unlike Oprah and Reagan). Like Trump, FDR was a businessman first. (He had extensive ties to Wall Street and had eleven directorships at top companies before going into politics. See historian Antony Sutton’s meticulous breakdown of his corporate career.) Once IN politics, FDR engaged in the “newfangled technology of the day,” radio, and gave fireside chats. Which at the time was said to be vulgar and beneath the dignity of a President.
It was the Twitter of its day.
Both Trump and FDR were bizarrely framed as the billionaire populists.
In summation: No, Trump was not a movie star. He made his money selling buildings. The dabbling in commercials and Miss Universe pageants were things to spread and promote his brand.
But media was NOT his brand. Real estate was.
Media was merely a means to an end.
For Oprah and Reagan, media was not merely a means to an end. It was their whole job. (They were famous for nothing else).
* Footnote: In the end, it’s highly unlikely that Oprah will ever run. She has too many complications. Like her awkward spinsterhood and swirling questions about her “celibacy”. I mean, who would be the First lady? Her friend Gayle? (Likewise Oprah has too many ties to Hollywood’s pedophile rings and that girl’s school of hers in Africa, where the children were used for sex slaves.) Because of all her skeletons, no: The smart money says that she won’t, in the end, invite the level of scrutiny that comes with running for President. The media that would have protected Oprah in the past (and covered for her many glaring missteps) is collapsing. The monolithic media complex that she relied on her whole career will not be there for her in 2020. (Just as Bill Cosby was suddenly vulnerable, so is Oprah. And I don’t think she likes that kind of exposure. She’s not used to it.) The new media landscape is a scary place where Oprah’s protectors have less power to kill stories, or spike unfavorable reports. But let’s face it: The Shadow Government’s plan was not to put celebrities into power, per se. It was to put in minorities of one stripe or another. They saw how effective it was to shut down criticism of Obama. (“You’re just against his tax-plan because . . . because . . . he’s black!”) Accountability that was standard-practice for white Presidents was off the table for the first black President (whom we were assured it was “racist” to disagree with). They liked the idea of an unaccountable President. Which is why they loaded up Hillary Clinton afterward (and cued up the “War on Women” propaganda, to place her beyond the reach of criticism.) “You’re against her capital gains policy? It’s because you’re against ALL WOMEN!” After the first female, they’ll doubtless do “The First Gay,” “The First Deaf President,” “The First Albino,” etc. The point is: To manipulate the American prejudice in favor of underdogs and use “perceived minority status” to get people into power who are essentially unaccountable. People who will NOT be held to the standards of traditional Presidents, and whom the media will impress upon the public it is illegitimate to question or scrutinize. (“You’re just against President Dinklage, because . . . because he’s a midget!”)
Seriously, what the hell is going on with Oprah?
After watching her speech someone told me to watch from that award show, I wondered if Oprah has been cloned or something? Has she been turned or was she always THAT turned? She looked great and renewed and spouted vague notions of change but never mentioned #metoo, as though her final non words on the subject decreed it thusly over. We would try to be better. Never mind that actual accusers like Rose MacGowan were not invited at all. The Winestain was never mentioned by name, and it was tacitly implied there would be no more witch hunt. No need to dig deeper for the pedos, the satanists, the scum, we had endured enough, now that men know what women go through, it’s okay… the camera panned over teary eyed female celebs, showing our ‘idols’ agreeing with Oprah. The high priestess of fast food spirituality has spoken on the matter… And then her undying support of media, a rallying call to respect our media. I wondered how anyone got future president out of that speech either. And if that were even possible, what the hell crazy timeline are we living in… Just curious what others think is going on with her these days.
______________
bradok: Oprah being Oprah, Corporate sell out that she is. Now putting trial balloons out for President, she would be the perfectly controlled ignoramus to take the Presidency and allow the fuckers who have just about driven this Republic into the ground to finish the fucking job.
That said, the Awards were a fucking disaster, that prove once and for all that Hollywood can *not* police their own. They had the chance to do so with the Weinstein, Spacey, and CK revelations, and they’ve shown they have no fucking plans to do so. I think that’s part of the reason Enty on CD&N seems so angry and emboldened now…calling out Feldman and the rest of these hacks. If you don’t already read CD&N I highly recommend it.
Link- http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/
dingdangow: I hope this golden globes shit show convinced many to turn off their televisions from now on. These people could not be more fake, almost all of them. Appalling, shameless reaction to the weinstein scandal. The lapel pins and black was as effective as it was meant to be, which was to have no effect at all. They even brought Natalie Woods rapist back on for yet another fawning tribute. That had a meaning, along with a few other things.
Oprah is unqualified to run for president, but I have little doubt that will stop her. We’ve entered idiocracy.
crimbobo: There sure is a lot of money in propaganda…oh sorry I mean entertainment.
Since the very beginning, movies and tv have been used to “educate” people with all the pieces that our shitty schools couldn’t cover. Children, whose parents were both forced to work to pay rent, bills etc. we’re plonked down in front of tvs from the time they could sit upright.
Tv and mainly advertising, fed our brains with how we are supposed to live in this corporate society since we were babies. It made us want things and do anything to get them. Beg, steal, or worse, work some shitty job and save up. It made us feel shit when we didn’t have the newest and best.
Not many people understand that television shows are designed to keep you watching a network so you will see the ads. For the networks, there is only advertising revenue, they couldn’t GAF about anything else.
Enjoy your drug ads. Enjoy your fast food ads. Enjoy your insurance ads. Oprah made allllll of her money doing all this shit.
If she becomes president we are all gone.
Whaddaya Say?