SuperPoop: Aren’t the Saudi royal families Trillionaires? And I read that Putin doesn’t need to disclose his fortune that he’s accumulated.
thepaip: Bilderberg group is crazy. They somewhat also hijacked Bitcoin to make it slow and unusable, leading to the creation of Bitcoin Cash
OmarComingRun: I dont see how they tie into the trilateral commison, CFR and bilderberg. I thought Rockefeller was the main guy behind the CFR
arrobats: The Red Shield is a front for the Black Nobility. The Rothschilds are just the public guardians of the global parasitic network that has sucked humanity dry for centuries. They all need to be exterminated and eliminated from this beautiful green and blue planet.
I__II__I: this makes no sense.
a) there are more than 9 Rothschilds.
b) the part about how they exclude dictators etc. talks about people like mugabe, putin, and the saudis who have wealth beyond just what typical markets and assets can measure.
c) there’s no conspiracy; the same website lists the rothschilds as the wealthiest family
> The Rothschild Family, Germany
> Estimated Net Worth: $350 billion – $2 trillion
> The Rothschild name has been associated with international banking since at least the late 1700s. Mayer Rothschild, the original patriarch, was a favored assistant and finance manager of the German royal family. He leveraged his position in court to develop a banking business for the German aristocracy. When his five sons reached adulthood, they were stationed in Frankfurt, London, Naples, Paris and Vienna to manage local banking affairs. From there, a multi-century financial empire flourished.
> Due to their relatively low profiles and private business activities, the Rothschilds have captured the imagination of financial historians and conspiracy theorists alike. It is difficult to track and verify their various holdings among so many descendants, but they are still fabulously wealthy. The family motto is: Concordia Integritas Industria, meaning “Harmony, Integrity, Industry.”
What are you on about son?
Veritas__Aequitas: 2 trillion in assets under management does not equal 2 trillion dollars of personal assets.
bulla564: The most basic principle of money management is capital preservation (aka at minimum, make your wealth grow with inflation). These fuckers were bankrolling the Bank of England back in the 1800s, so we can safely assume their wealth has only grown since then.
unruly_mattress: Are the Rotschilds a royal family? No. Are the Rothschilds dictators? No. Is the Forbes quote relevant? No. Is it present in the infographic to present a rather weak excuse to them not showing up on Forbes richest people? Yes.
Don’t worry though, there’s another website that does research into how rich people and dynasties are. It’s called [Forbes](https://www.forbes.com/2002/02/28/0228dynasties.html#4b639d6c6824), and it lists that the Rothschilds have $1.5 billion in the UK and France. There’s also [Forbes](https://www.forbes.com/2001/06/21/0621dynasty.html#18f843fd1b55) that lists $1.4 billion. So you see, even though Forbes ignores royalty families, you can still find the information on Forbes.
Also, the top of the [Investopedia page](https://www.investopedia.com/updates/history-rothschild-family/) says:
> [CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article cited an estimate of the combined net worth of the Rothschilds at $350 billion. That estimate came from a source that does not meet Investopedia’s standards, and we have consequently retracted it. Similarly, an estimate that the Rothschilds controlled more than $2 trillion worth in assets was also inadequately sourced and retracted.]
So it makes sense that the claim would appear in an infographic. Why not $700 trillion this time? That was what I had to refute last time. Oh well.
Likewise the claim that there are only 9 Rothschilds is quite dubious, not to say completely false since the first result in Google names 11 of them.
mjschreff: rothchilds are winning at monopoly
SaracenRush: Unfortunately investopedia retracted their 2 trillion estimate. Any other sources? I couldn’t find any.
phunnypunny: The onion tastes better the closer it is to the center.
jsgui: Control != own.
narrowpilot: Can’t find the referenced email anywhere.
SocialOrganism: Solid original post – address the discrepancy on assets under management vs. assets owned and its a best post of 2017.
3Msleep: Trump could be a secret Rothschild for all we know.
WhyNotManere: Ah the good old Rothschild scare. Sure they are rich as fuck but at the same time a lot of them is just scare tactics by nazis since the beginning of the 18th century.
Todays rothschilds are more or less just random rich person born into a rich family. Most of them have nothing to do with banking or politics. Also their entire networth is devided on litteraly HUNDRETS if not thousends of people.
Also I wanna add that they sold or lost a lot of their former income sources like their banks and a lot of their land.
Almost all their income nowadays comes from their wine and estate in England.
Also I wanna add that the austrian and german family tree was completly whiped away from the face of the earth by Hitler and their money sized.
7katalan: Sorry bud, the Rothschilds are just the tip of the iceberg. The real rich people make them look like Oliver Twist.
The richest people in the world have quadrillions, pentillions, so much money there’s no point in putting a number on it;
and I guarantee you we don’t know their names. The only thing we know is their sur-surname, and that’s “Yaldabaoth”.
**This is not to say that people should not be aware of Rothschild control and wealth. Simply that, if you know their names, there’s no way they’re on the top of the pyramid.**
YoungUrbanFailure: Cute infographic except you forgot to put the part in where investopedia, the source for your claim that the Rothschilds control $2 trillion, corrected themselves saying the info was inadequately sourced and retracted the statement. But, CoNSpIrACy! Gotta blame someone for why your life isn’t as grand as you think it should be…
Severe-Autism: And the Rothschilds are Jewish…
“We are paying about $1.4 billion every day just for the interest on the national debt. Because our government refuses to live within its means, every single day we spend $1.4 billion and receive absolutely nothing in return”
— Ron Paul
WTables68: As long as we are the reserve currency, we don’t need to balance the budget. Now how big is too big of a deficit? That’s a fair question
passivehate: Our economy doesn’t function without that debt, It’s kind of where our money comes from. We have to change the whole system.
AspiringOligarch: Here is a list of the public debt of all nations worldwide.
***They are all in debt***. But to who?
Debtors are subservient to lenders. Follow the money.
dtr1002: UK 92%?
Tories, great with the economy.
m82918: the reason everyone invests in the US debt is because it pays the HIGHEST interest in the world out of any sovereign debt. this is what US citizens are paying!! billions!
other countries’ debt often has ZERO interest ..
Romek_himself: i did read the USA has to pay in 2020 $1 Trillion per year direct to the banks just for debt interests.
this means $1 Trillion per year tax money direct to the banks and the debt goes not 1 cent lower.
RumpleForeskin1982: Of frequent concern is how the national debt will be paid off. This overlooks the fact that banks don’t lend any tangible thing to anyone – not even to governments.
While we’re told that no one is as far in the hole as Uncle Sam, it will be difficult to define and describe precisely ‘what monetary substance the World Bank, IMF or The Fed have loaned to Uncle Sam or the world’s many bankrupt nations. This is because bankers are the actual debtors. They only pretend to make the loans.
Of course, the public is equal to the task, pretending to borrow a sum of nothing in proportion to the numbers shown on little slips of paper.
So how much of the national debt is actually owed to whom?
LeakyOne: “Interest” the greatest scam in the history of man. Its no surprise such usury has been banned and decried in many societies since thousands of years ago.
UltimateWeiner: “Because we can’t live within our means” makes it sound like the average citizen is a little piggy benefitting from this system. I know he doesn’t necessarily believe that, but putting it that way suggests we have even a little say in the matter. Just say we live under the rule of predatory capitalists who exploit the masses to enrich themselves.
digits: Israels payout is more important
JamesMeRoll: We are just printing more money, and once our debtors get tired of it there will be another crash. Maybe worse than the last one
iXbrian: how about gutting the military for a start?
funkenstein_1: who cares when you can just print money. smoke & mirrors. The national budget doesn’t work like a household one.
song-of-bombadil: maybe, just maybe, if our currency was issued and owned by our government instead of a private banking cabal there would be no need to pay interest on it’s use.
as for staying on budget, keep electing the 95% who easily are re-elected every cycle even tho their approval rating is in the toilet … that’ll fix it!
SoCo_cpp: The reason this is coming up a very lot lately, is due to the small deficit increase the Republican tax reform bill is to add.
When Republicans do it, everyone cries. When Democrats do it, it’s an investment in progress. I think we simply have convenient double standards. For such a massively progressive tax reform, the deficit increase is pretty minimum and would be completely ignored with the regular expected economic stimulation, if it were not being reported by cheerleaders for the other team.
The government wants “helter skelter”
The government wants to keep the races at each other’s throats. Because when we’re fixated and frustrated with one another, we lose sight of the fact that our government is raping us on behalf of the ultra rich that pay them to do so. I can’t believe everyone doesn’t see it.
CrazyRusFW: Divide and conquer. Black vs white, rural vs urban, republican vs democrat etc etc. Just don’t look at the man in the corner passing another “Patriot Act” and tax “reform”
McMikeHawk: Most of us already know that. You’ll have to convince others. They’ll see it.
infatuatedwithfilth: It is ZOG that needs gentiles to be at odds with each other. Blaming “the government” is the plan outlined in The Protocols.
hiking425: It’s not limited to races at this point. Social class, education level, age, gender, political or religious preference are all regularly shown now in disagreement. It seems like they are trying to divide everyone and in a world where everyone is divided a world changing event could bring everyone back together, like UFOs showing.
EnoughNoLibsSpam: when they try to make us hate
we respond with a mantra of love